CO129-541-11 Cheng Kwok Yau- trial judge's notes 1-1-1932 - 31-12-1932 — Page 194

194

23.8.32

on may date

twe

those two dates.

Re X Lindaell

The compound at Police E.Q. is open to the public

by day à by night.

It became public knowledge that there had been an

arrest in this onse, on the Est April,

Case for the frown.

Pr. entitled to any reasonable doubt, but Crown is

not bound to give actual demonstration.

It is

case of

cirmama tantial evidence,

Duty of counsel for the Crow to put all the facts,

not to presa for a conviction.

Base strengthened s ince opening.

1. Admitted that Fr. went to Hathan Hotel on the

night of the 17th/18th March. Room engaged,

faked cal 1. Tot denied.

Visit of Zimmern & others to Nathan Hotel on the

night of the 20th/21st March, Defence suggested

as a reason that Z. à Chr. wanted to get Pr.

involved in an assaut on Fangs that Fr. agreed

only on condition of slaŭping only.

Pr. had lost face, and wanted to alap Pung's face

all right.

If Zimmern & Christie's story is not true then the

true facts have not been put before you by the defence.

Defence of intended swindle. I have never understood

Samity would give no ground for the swindle:

the defen -

murder wouldə

Oo incidence unparalled if r. innocent.

Zimsen's statement of the"31st March" (2nd. April -

-

p.104). His reason – seeing Pr. & Brutton fear of

double crossing.

Z. had reason to fear only if 7r. had

(118)